Skip to content

Rough Book

random musings

Menu
  • About Me
  • Contact
  • Projects
    • bAdkOde
    • CherryBlossom
    • FXCalendar
    • Sulekha
Menu

Qwest charges a “setup fee” for static IP’s

Posted on October 13, 2009October 23, 2009 by vivin

Two weeks ago, I finally got my DSL upgrade from a measly 3Mbps to a whopping (for me) 12Mbps. I have been on 3Mbps since 2004, and the difference is amazing. I'm able to stream HD quality stuff from Netflix all the time! Qwest set me up with an Actiontec Q1000 router/modem, which as far as routers go, is not that great. But it does the job... somewhat. My previous modem (also from Qwest) would let me grab multiple IP's from Qwest if I had it plugged into a switch (every machine that was plugged into that switch got an IP from Qwest's pool). However, the Actiontec is different. Since it's a router, it basically just enables DHCP and gives you an address. This was a problem for me because I have three machines that face the outside world and I use DynDNS so that I can access them. The router does some port-mapping, but that wasn't an option. Since my website was my top priority, I set it up in a DMZ and figured that I could access the other two machines through my webserver, so no big deal. But yeah, didn't work completely. DynDNS uses the modem's IP for my webserver. I can access my website without any problem, from the outside world. But if I try to get to it from within my network, I end up at the Actiontec's configuration page. Stupid. So eventually I just decided to get some static IP's. The price was pretty reasonable: a block of 8 for $14.99 a month. Then I saw the setup fee: $50. Seriously? FIFTY dollars to set up a block of IP addresses? It gets even better. The more IP addresses you order, the higher the "setup fee" goes. Here's the full chart:

# of IP Addresses Monthly Rate One Time Charge
1 (1 useable) $5.95 $25.00
8 (5 useable) $14.95 $50.00
16 (13 useable) $29.95 $75.00
32 (29 useable) $59.95 $150.00
64 (61 useable) $119.95 $250.00

Source: Qwest.net: How much do static IP addresses cost and how many addresses do I get?

I had a hard time understanding this. I mean, I'll admit that I'm not a networking expert. But how hard can setting up static IP's be? Does it really take $50 worth of work? I'm assuming it involves some configuration - probably a few keystrokes or something of that nature. $50 for that? Maybe it's completely different from what I think. Maybe IP addresses are huge blocks of stone that need to be moved from place to place, therefore there are obvious labor costs. Whatever. $50 sounds ridiculous to me. I figured I'd talk to Qwest and see if they could explain this cost to me. I didn't get anywhere with the reps online, but the prompt and helpful folks at @TalkToQwest finally emailed me with an answer:

Hello Vivin,

After doing a little research on the matter I have found out a little more about the business decision to charge for setting up Static IP’s. Initially, there is a lot more in the way of system software that has to be implemented on our order side to facilitate these orders as apposed to the standard issue.

Additionally, the potential costs of features/functions that are afforded the customer with these services potentially require more resources and as such, cost to maintain and implement.

The setup cost is a way to spread that cost across the specific platform at what is considered a reasonable amount. How exactly they come up with this figure is of course something that I would not be privy to and would be considered proprietary marketing/business internally confidential information that I could not disclose any how, but that is the basic reason why we charge for the setup. There are cost unique to Static IP’s and they need to be covered.

Hope that helps explain it a bit anyway.

Not exactly the answer I was looking for, but I appreciate the time that the rep took to write me an email, and I guess I did understand the rep's point that there are some costs involved. But come on, now... The point about "cost to maintain and implement" - I assume that this could easily be covered by the $14.99 I pay them every month. Other than that, I don't see any reason to have a setup fee. If you ask me, there's really only one reason. I apologize if I'm being cynical, but honestly I think it's just a way for Qwest to make a quick buck. I can't think of any other reason. I also don't really buy into the whole "proprietary marketing/internal business/confidential" aspect of this, because come on... it's just networking. I'm assuming that not too many people care about the fee, or ask about it and so Qwest is able to get away with it. Come to think of it, whoever invented the concept of a the "setup fee" is a genius. It's a technical and important-sounding phrase that is also completely meaningless.

Anyway, I decided to take the hit and order them because I need the block. But overall I think it should be mandatory for companies to itemize and describe all the elements that make up a "setup fee" instead of just charging their customers some random amount. As customers we have a right to know what we're paying for.

2 thoughts on “Qwest charges a “setup fee” for static IP’s”

  1. Nicholas says:
    July 12, 2011 at 10:31 pm

    what was your old modem that allowed you to get multiple ip’s with a switch ? Will have to get one 🙂 I’m on 7mbps.

    Reply
  2. vivin says:
    July 15, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    @Nicholas
    It was a Cisco 678 :). I don’t think they make them anymore though.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • February 2023
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • March 2017
  • November 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • February 2016
  • August 2015
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • August 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • November 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • June 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • February 2005
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • December 2002
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • February 2002
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • April 2001
  • March 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • December 2000
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • January 2000
  • December 1999
  • November 1999
  • October 1999
  • September 1999
©2023 Rough Book | Built using WordPress and Responsive Blogily theme by Superb
All original content on these pages is fingerprinted and certified by Digiprove