<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rough Book &#187; pr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vivin.net/tag/pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vivin.net</link>
	<description>random musings of just another computer nerd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:32:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>There is no Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://vivin.net/2008/12/28/there-is-no-windows-7/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://vivin.net/2008/12/28/there-is-no-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vivin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freebsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivin.net/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a first look at the Windows 7 beta. All I could really get from the review was that &#8220;it&#8217;s done&#8221;, and that it &#8220;feels snappier&#8221; and that it is &#8220;more responsive&#8221;. In the screenshots it still looks like Vista. The taskbar reminds me of KDE. A bunch of torrent sites have the beta [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a <a target = "_blank" href = "http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=3222">first look</a> at the <a target = "_blank" href = "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7">Windows 7</a> beta. All I could really get from the review was that &#8220;it&#8217;s done&#8221;, and that it &#8220;feels snappier&#8221; and that it is &#8220;more responsive&#8221;. In the screenshots it still looks like <a target = "_blank" href = "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista">Vista</a>. The taskbar reminds me of <a target = "_blank" href = "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KDE">KDE</a>. A <a target = "_blank" href = "http://www.itwire.com/content/view/22478/1103">bunch</a> of torrent sites have the beta up for download. Microsoft is expected to announce the build&#8217;s public availability in January. So you can get a copy of it and try it out, but to do so might be &#8220;breaking the law&#8221;. But that hasn&#8217;t deterred a bunch of people who&#8217;re out downloading it. Right now, <a target = "_blank" href = "http://piratebay.org">piratebay</a>&#8216;s torrent for the beta is showing 2,503 seeds and 8,137 peers.</p>
<p>On another note though. People seem to think that this is a <em>new</em> operating system from Microsoft. It isn&#8217;t. It&#8217;s just Vista Service Pack 3, in my opinion. I mean, how long did it take Microsoft to come up with Vista after XP? I seriously doubt they got a brand new operating system out in about a year and a half. The name is just a PR campaign to bury the name &#8220;Vista&#8221;. There is so much bad press and publicity surrounding the name that Microsoft has to get away from it, if they want the Vista codebase to be successful. </p>
<p>I had Vista on my laptop. It was alright; I didn&#8217;t use it long enough to run into too many issues. The UAC prompts were pretty annoying though. Also, compiling anything on it took forever. I&#8217;m running Ubuntu on it now, and it&#8217;s way faster. My sister and my dad both run Vista, but I haven&#8217;t heard of them having any problems. If Windows 7 really is good, then I might actually consider running it. I currently have only one Windows machine and that&#8217;s running XP. Everything else is either running FreeBSD or Linux.</p>
<br /><a href="http://vivin.net/?p=397#comments" title="Comments on &quot;There is no Windows 7&quot;"><img src="http://vivin.net/wp-content/plugins/feed-comments-number/image.php?397" alt="Comments" /></a><img src="http://vivin.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&#38;id=397&#38;type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vivin.net/2008/12/28/there-is-no-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://vivin.net/wp-content/plugins/feed-comments-number/image.php?397" />
		<media:content url="http://vivin.net/wp-content/plugins/feed-comments-number/image.php?397" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Comments</media:title>
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://vivin.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&#38;id=397&#38;type=feed" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

